You are hereBlogs / mel's blog / Did You Follow Baby Borrowers on NBC?
Did You Follow Baby Borrowers on NBC?
I love, scratch that, am addicted to reality TV. I’ve never missed a season of Big Brother. I jumped on board during the second seasons of Amazing Race and Survivor. Every season I say I’m not going to waste my time. Then its, “Well, I’ll just watch the first show to see what the twist is.” I don’t make any false statements at that point, I simply watch. It must be an illness yet I DO have a line and NBC has crossed it with Baby Borrowers.
Ok, so, I know I’m late to this slumber party but honestly, when I heard of Baby Borrowers a few months ago I was sure it would be cancelled before it aired. The premise was just too terrible. Apparently it’s been aired and is in fact nearing its conclusion.
Stephanie Brown: Stephanie Brown writes for About.comI started perusing the blogging world to see what people think and came across Stephanie's Babies & Toddlers Blog in which she stated that she thinks people are missing the bigger point. It seems that teenage pregnancy is a high priority to Stephanie as it should be to all of us. I’m not down playing the importance of our teenage pregnancy problem however I do not agree that the abuse of babies and toddlers is a good or appropriate way to get through to teenagers.
Let's look at teenagers for a moment here. I find it highly unlikely that teenagers around the nation have been rushing home to watch Baby Borrowers willingly allowing NBC to make a point. The risk to them is too great! They might have to walk away from the show and admit that adults do know something. How many teenagers do you personally know that have ever uttered the words, “You’re right”? They'd rather gag on poo!
NBC sees no problem with the show, only dollar signs through ratings.
Would you really want to trust your children to be cared for by teenagers picked by a TV network presumably for entertainment? My understanding is that more tantrums came form the teenagers than the toddlers!
I know I'm overly attached to the issue. I find it personally disgusting and I'm simply appalled at the very existence of the show. I admit a lack of objectivity here so why don't you take a look at what the pros had to say.
"For the past 80 years, many studies have shown unequivocally that babies and toddlers suffer when they are exposed to this kind of prolonged separation from family and left with people that they do not know or love." This statement is from Zero To Three, a nonprofit organization devoted to the development and well being of babies and toddlers. They have been pursuing this goal for 30 years. This site was used as a frequent reference in a recent sociology of childhood course I took. I find their content valuable and trustworthy.
For those that would like a few more sources there is the APA, which issued this statement “The American Psychiatric Association deplores the use of babies and toddlers as props or experimental subjects for a television program. It is inappropriate and sometimes harmful to remove very young children from their families and familiar environments, and the level of harm may not be apparent on simple observation. Since the program is meant to reveal whether or not the ‘borrowers’ are competent to care for these children, at least some of the children will have been exposed to incompetent and confused caregivers, and to whatever problematic situations arose as the caregivers struggled with each other. We urge NBC never to repeat this misuse of children; not to allow reruns to air; and to use every means to discourage the use of episodes in parenting classes or other venues where they might well be shown.”
And a final word from the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry who says, “Separating babies and toddlers from their parents for extended periods of time can lead children to feel distress and anxiety. After prolonged separation, a child can feel distrust for his or her primary caregiver. Separation can damage a healthy attachment and a child's sense of safety.”
Jamie felt I needed to see an episode to be objective but I’ve only been able to find episodes with the preteens and teens to replay online. The babies and toddlers are the ones in danger. I don’t disagree with Jamie but I’m thankful that I could not find an episode because it’s hard to see watching an episode as research rather than support.
Jamie - The Voice of ReasonI don’t believe I need to watch an episode to know that the use of babies and toddlers in this series was reality TV at its cruelest yet. But you know what, they'll do it again and soon enough they'll do something worse because that's what the viewers want. I’m sad that the show went on but not surprised in the least.
So, tell me, did you watch the show? Do you know any teenagers that watched the show? Did you intentionally boycott the show? Did you even hear of the show? Tell me what you thought.
- mel's blog
- 1343 reads























Actually yes I do know Teenagers who watched this show. I am 18 and became addicted to this show. My mom and I watched it together and I loved it, it did teach me a lesson. Kids are hard work and these kids really tested the teens on the show. So I would think twice before wanting kids at 19 or 20 after watching this show.
Thank you Anna. I am very happy to read that some good did come from the show.
Can you think of an alternative to this tv show that would have shown you the same thing? How about spending a day or a week yourself with a family that has a new infant? I think something like that would be a good program and it wouldn't affect the infants or toddlers in a negative way.
I'm very close to delivering our second baby and if there was such a program I would consider allowing a teenager to stay with me for a few days to see just how overwhelming it can be. That's a win-win in my book. A little help for me and a great lesson for a teenager.
Kirsten, as a matter of fact, I left a good job in order that my children could have one parent at home with them nearly all of the time.
You are trying to compare hiring a babysitter for a couple of hours with what happened on the show. Think about it a little more. Separating a baby from his or her parents and/or primary caregiver for several days is different than separating them for several hours.
I know that parents often need to make childcare arrangements in order to work. This is done for a lot of reasons, and I'm not going to second guess parents for the decisions they make in this regard. But these parents left their children for a rather long time (longer than a working parent would leave a child in daycare) for a chance to be on a reality TV show. That strikes me as being a poor decision.
Infants need what they need. As children, they will grow into life in the 21st century. But as infants, they have needs that don't change with the times. We need to do a better job understanding and respecting those needs.
And also, there is NO seperation anxiety here that is going to hurt the baby. Do you work? Well if you do than from your point of view you are damaging your babies like because you leave them to work. Do you want time with your husband/wife away from the baby? Well again from your point of view you are a horrible person because your baby will have seperation anxiety. Come one people, think.
To address your comments Kirsten I found a nice timeline guide regarding separation anxiety and separation anxiety disorder at HelpGuide.org. They are a nonprofit organization devoted to helping people overcome health challenges at all ages and stages.
* First few months: Babies don’t differentiate much among caregivers and usually can be calmed by any loving person, regardless of relationship. This is why new parents often get more emotional the first time they leave an infant with a babysitter or at day care than the baby does!
* 7-14 months: By about 7 months, babies realize that there’s only one Mommy and/or Daddy, but they don’t have a sense of time, so even if parents step into the next room for a minute, all the baby knows is that they’re gone — maybe forever! — and they’re going to cry or cling or do whatever it takes to keep that from happening. This phase is often called “stranger anxiety,” because even the happiest child becomes shy or fearful around everyone but the primary caregiver, and generally peaks before 18 months.
* Toddler/preschool years: Children can be anxious and become emotional when a parent or primary caregiver leaves but can be distracted by activities with the caregiver or other children.
* By age 5: Most children are secure enough to be left with a babysitter or dropped off at school without distress.
First, I would like to make very clear that I make no connection between the actions of working parents and the parents that volunteered their children for this show. Further, I feel certain that the parents that volunteered their children for this show were wooed by the executives at NBC and did not intentionally endanger their children.
Second, I am in fact a stay at home mom. I consider myself lucky to be able to do that and I realize it is not something that everyone is able to do. My son is 16 months old tomorrow and has been with a babysitter 2 times. The first time he was 2 months old for 4 hours and the second time was just 2 weeks ago for 3 hours when he was still 15 months old.
I’m afraid I don’t follow your arguments in the first comment. If you’d like to rearticulate then I would attempt to address it. The argument that NBC executives know more about the welfare of children than the 3 agencies I referenced in my post is simply absurd to me. Sorry. I call it like I see it and I believe I’m thinking quite clearly.
Wow however wrote this needs to come into the 21ist century. This show was a great and helped a lot of teens. And the babies were not abused in the least, shit they were probably better looked after on this show than if a babysitter was watching them. You type of people are just really sad. Oh and the 0 to 3 guy was a dumb ass who lost his argument because there are people in this world who have a correct thought. And I hopeeee there will be a season 2.
I received the following email from Zero to Three today. It's not like I'm special. I'm just on their mailing list. LOL!
ZERO TO THREE Alert: Baby Borrowers Town Hall Meeting
NBC aired the final episode of its Baby Borrowers reality show on July 30th and then capped its season with a nationally televised “Town Hall” meeting about the show last night (August 6). Thanks to the multitude of passionate early childhood professionals, parents and others interested in the well-being of babies, it appears that NBC got the message and offered ZERO TO THREE an opportunity to express our concerns about the show during the Town Hall meeting. ZERO TO THREE was represented by Kyle Pruett, MD, a past president of our Board of Directors and one of our Emeritus Board members.
Dr. Pruett served as a very effective voice for babies by raising many of the issues that clearly disturbed thousands of early childhood professionals about the show. While the televised town hall meeting focused a great deal on the issue of adolescent pregnancy prevention, Dr. Pruett made a point of telling NBC and the producer that the show’s premise of putting babies and toddlers in the care of teenagers who were ill prepared to attend to the needs of these children was flawed.
Since we issued our alert about this show, hundreds of you responded and echoed your concerns. Your passion helped keep the interests of babies and toddlers front and center, and we believe your added voices led NBC to invite Dr. Pruett to the Town Hall show. Many other organizations — including the American Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Association and the National Association for the Education of Young Children — issued their own statements of concern. Together, we helped to give voice to the needs and interests of very young children. Thank you for your continued passion and interest.
Thanks for the visit Peter and for telling me about your daughter watching. What do you think? Will there be a Season 2?
My 13 year old daughter followed the show avidly. I watched a little, just so I can talk with her about it. I really did not like the show, and I think NBC should be ashamed that they ever aired it. At least they gave airtime to a competent, articulate critic on the final show. I only wished that they had listened to him back when they were just thinking about the show.
Post new comment